Find the actual process, who it serves and what the evidence does—and does not—establish.
Research checked October 4, 2026. A dossier may document a usable process, a historical example, or a specific unresolved implementation gap. It is not a promise of current intake.
Inspect the source register and relationship definitions → · Download the structured dossiers
177 instrument dossiers
Try a different term or clear the filters. An empty search is not evidence that a legal power or program does not exist.
ONR supplies a concrete competitive Navy/Marine Corps S&T route, not an exclusive implementation of the broad defense-research power.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Research performers in industry and academia
Documented use · Notice published; deadline ahead
FY 2027 MURI provides a currently published university research grant/cooperative-agreement route with an explicit statutory link.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
U.S. degree-granting science/engineering universities
Direct implementation · FY 2027 notice published
DARPA publishes a concrete research-OT proposal route; this is one implementing agency, not the exclusive holder of § 4021 authority.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Research performers whose proposed basic, applied or advanced research fits a DARPA announcement
Direct implementation · Standing process documented
DIU’s named CSO process supplies an illustrative section 4022 prototype route. Its use of the CSO label is distinct from procurement under section 3458.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Commercial technology providers responding to a stated mission problem
Direct implementation · No CSO opening displayed at check
DIU publishes an operational Success Memo route for buyers considering follow-on production from successful competitively selected prototypes.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government buyers and the successful prototype participants; not a fresh open call for unrelated vendors
Direct implementation · Transition process and public catalog documented
AFRL CHEERS Open Period 2 explicitly invokes section 4023 and publishes a two-step white-paper process through September 30, 2027. Funding remains contingent, and the solicitation has an overall ceiling.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Businesses and research performers addressing the specified human-performance and aerospace-medicine technical areas
Direct implementation · Published white-paper window; funding contingent
The current ONR BAA expressly permits the section 4004 bridge; this is stronger evidence than a generic prototype-program link.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Performers with a qualifying competed BAA contract
Direct implementation · Mechanism documented in current notice
DIU currently publishes a section 4025 prize challenge with a separate, conditional follow-on route.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
U.S. and international participants subject to screening and challenge terms
Direct implementation · Submission deadline ahead
The official program is now branded RISE. Legacy RIF solicitations and current statutory ceilings do not establish an open call.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Small businesses with technology ready for defense-program insertion
Documented use · Program documented; new intake not verified
DIU’s public government-partner process is useful implementation context, but does not by itself prove use of every special § 4127 partnership or pooled-resource provision.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government organizations with a mission problem, project liaison and prototype funding; commercial providers enter through resulting competitions
Related process · Institutional partnering process documented
CMU-SEI offers a verifiable example of sponsored FFRDC work with a current contract and work-plan process; it is not an open grant scheme.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government project sponsors; other collaborators through authorized arrangements
Documented use · Current contract documented
The legal access mechanism is documented, but a current section-specific public intake was not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Entities seeking to use eligible underutilized laboratory capabilities
Unverified · Implementation not verified for section 4124
NISE has an explicit internal laboratory funding process under section 4123 and a documented 2026 project; local restrictions are not universal statutory rules.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Internal laboratory principal investigators
Direct implementation · Process and 2026 use documented
DARPA supplies a currently dated, topic-specific SBIR route rather than a generic instruction to contact an agency.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible US small-business research performers
Direct implementation · Named topic shown accepting submissions
DARPA has a dated STTR solicitation route with a mandatory research-institution partnership, not simply an alternative label for SBIR.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible small businesses partnered with a qualifying US research institution
Direct implementation · Named topic shown accepting submissions
Phase III starts with an actual SBIR/STTR lineage and a funded customer; the Navy publishes a practical split between program-office help and contracting authority.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government customers and firms whose work derives from, extends or completes prior SBIR/STTR work
Direct implementation · Published transition process; no single intake competition
A newly published AFWERX SBT FAQ now ties the strategic-breakthrough mechanism directly to the 2026 law; it is not merely renamed STRATFI.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible small businesses with a successfully completed Phase II and a government sponsor
Direct implementation · Program-specific guidance published
Army TABA provides a concrete assistance process under section 638(q), including newly listed cybersecurity and workforce support for 2026.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible Army SBIR/STTR applicants and awardees
Direct implementation · Published 2026 service expansion
The original corpus snapshot omitted the enacted 2025 joint-facility expansion. The current record includes it; public implementing regulations and a specifically attributed project remain unverified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government program sponsors and eligible non-Federal partners
Unverified · Expansion enacted; regulations unverified
WSMR currently documents reimbursable commercial testing. Its older detailed customer-process page now returns HTTP 404 but remains indexed; current G-5 assignment and scheduling must be verified.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Private-industry test customers; separate routes for government and international customers
Related process · Commercial testing documented; detailed routing partly historical
A commander-level experimentation power is enacted, but this research did not verify a public implementing procedure or award expressly using section 873.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government operational sponsors; performers through an identified solicitation
Unverified · Authority enacted; attributed use unverified
The alternative pathway remains a specifically designated government acquisition process; publication of implementing guidance or a designation was not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government program managers and test organizations
Unverified · Guidance and designated use unverified
Current DoD cost-principle and administration deviations supply the actual IR&D allowability/reporting process, not an R&D grant application.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Contractors allocating IR&D to covered contracts
Direct implementation · Current deviation process documented
No public tool, prototype contract or published OEC analytic-tool intake was located with an explicit connection to section 9025(c)(7).
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Internal OEC analysts and lawfully participating government partners
Unverified · Statutory duty; public implementation not verified
Turn a shared laboratory R&D objective into a defined project and negotiated contributions—not a request for federal cash.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Non-federal R&D collaborators; this is not a grant application
Direct implementation · Process documented; project agreement required
Separate the entity eligible to hold a PIA from the businesses and universities it helps.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible intermediary entities; firms and universities can separately use intermediary services
Related process · Program directory and services documented
A concrete application route with a commercialization plan, negotiated rights and royalty obligations.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Prospective commercial licensees of government technology
Related process · Application process published; terms negotiated
Published Army rules name authorized organizations and patent-counsel routing for IP purchases under section 3793. The 2026 regulatory restructuring requires contract-specific reconciliation.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government buyers and owners of relevant intellectual property
Direct implementation · Published Army route; current clause reconciliation needed
iEdison makes the subject-invention reporting and government-license process concrete; no DoD march-in exercise is established by that reporting system.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Recipients of covered federal research funding agreements
Direct implementation · Reporting implementation documented
Contract authorization-and-consent clauses and the DOJ/Court of Federal Claims route provide the operating process for section 1498.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government contractors and affected patent owners
Direct implementation · Established contract/litigation process
Current DoD Part 27 deviation directly implements technical-data statutes; program teams still must separately obtain deliverables and sufficient license rights.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government acquisition/sustainment teams and their contractors
Direct implementation · Current regulatory process documented
Identify the actual royalty administrator while keeping internal receipts distinct from external financing.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Federal inventors, laboratories and royalty administrators; not outside grant applicants
Related process · Internal administration documented
A current DEPSCoR research-collaboration notice identifies the actual offices, mentor pairing, geographic eligibility and grant scale.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible-state university faculty paired with experienced defense-research mentors
Direct implementation · White-paper deadline ahead
The Navy FY 2027 competition has a mandatory white-paper gate already closed; December full proposals are invitation-only.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible U.S. minority-serving higher-education institutions
Documented use · New-entry gate closed; invited stage pending
DFARS documents a laboratory student-service contracting process expressly tied to section 4143; it is not the same as a scholarship or federal internship appointment.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Enrolled students at eligible U.S. institutions, often employed through a nonprofit
Direct implementation · Published process; specific vacancy unverified
SMART has a public 2026 application route for fall 2027 study, with binding civilian-service and clearance conditions.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible STEM students, including incoming freshmen, undergraduates and graduate students
Direct implementation · 2026 application route active
NSWC Corona documents practical STRL recruiting, while the 2026 enterprise review warns that department hiring controls constrain use of section 4091.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualified scientist/engineer degree holders and eligible veterans
Documented use · Recruiting process documented; constraints reported
DARPA publishes an expert-recruitment route, but its public careers page does not establish whether section 4092 or another appointment authority will be used.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Experienced technical leaders considering government service
Related process · Public careers route documented
A related STRL enhanced-pay process is public, but it operates under section 4121. It does not establish use of the distinct section 4094 program.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Exceptionally qualified senior technical candidates and internal hiring sponsors
Related process · Related process published; section 4094 use unverified
OPM distinguishes expert appointments under section 3109 from service contracts and supplies a concrete pay, documentation and reporting framework.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Individuals providing qualifying expert/advisory services
Direct implementation · Published HR process
DLA offers a concrete supply-procurement entry route; it is one example within broad departmental purchasing authority, not the exclusive contracting office.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Supply vendors responding to actual DLA requirements
Related process · Supplier process documented
Current DoD competition procedures provide an actionable government justification workflow; a vendor cannot elect sole-source treatment for itself.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government requirement owners; vendors responding to market research or an authorized solicitation
Direct implementation · Current process documented
SeaPort NxG is a documented Navy multiple-award IDIQ example; task-order participation is different from joining the parent vehicle.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government buyers and existing vehicle contract holders
Direct implementation · Current process documented
Existing MAC holders; prospective primes only during an announced admission window
Documented use · Rolling-admissions registration ended
Current multiyear-supply procedures and an actual CH-53K award demonstrate the mechanism without treating maximum contract value as obligated funding.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government equipment-acquisition programs and their selected suppliers
Direct implementation · Current process documented
Historical award example, not a new-company intake
Documented use · Award documented
The 2026 DoD deviation directly implements section 3531 with narrow service categories, written findings and an adjusted $900 million specific-law threshold.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government programs buying covered recurring services
Direct implementation · Current process documented
Statutory § 3458 CSOs have agency-specific contracting routes. A 2026 ACC/A2 notice is a concrete example, separate from DIU’s § 4022 OT-branded CSO.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Commercial solution providers whose proposals address the solicitation’s mission areas
Direct implementation · Umbrella documented; listed calls closed
Current financing rules explain what a contractor must negotiate and submit; financing is attached to a contract, not a free-standing investment program.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Contractors negotiating or administering eligible contracts
Direct implementation · Current process documented
JRAC explicitly identifies its section 3601 recommendation role; it is an internal urgent-needs coordination route, not a public grant application.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Combatant commands and government sponsors of validated urgent needs
Direct implementation · Process and current manual identified
MTA is an internal acquisition pathway, not a company application program or independent source of award funds.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government capability sponsors and acquisition teams; vendors compete through separately selected award instruments
Direct implementation · Implementing procedure documented
Software pathway planning has concrete documents and user commitments; current oversight shows that nominal pathway adoption does not guarantee effective user engagement.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government software programs and selected development partners
Related process · Current process documented; newer policy identified
APFIT has a concrete government-sponsored production transition process, eligibility attestation and funding chain; it is not a direct company grant application.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government sponsors supporting eligible production-ready US companies
Direct implementation · Program and FY 27 templates documented; live deadline unverified
The new consumption-based authority is codified, but no public implementing subcategory, current solicitation or award expressly attributed to section 3605 was verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government service buyers and potential suppliers of metered capabilities
Unverified · Enacted; implementation not verified
The section 843 pathway has an issued deviation and a concrete 2026 Navy implementation notice; the notice documents requests and approval routing, not completed awards.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government operational requirement owners
Direct implementation · Current use of request process documented
Quick Start has a verified JRAC routing role and historical R-GPS implementation, but that example’s follow-on was reported cancelled and is not a current application opportunity.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government sponsors of urgent development starts
Direct implementation · Government mechanism documented
Historical implementation example
Documented use · Historical awards; follow-on reported discontinued
Contractors have a published extraordinary-relief filing route, but approval is discretionary; FY 2026 separately adds review and timing requirements for hazardous/nuclear indemnification.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Contractors seeking relief within Public Law 85-804/EO 10789 conditions
Direct implementation · Current process documented
The current R&D deviation supplies explicit section 3861 contract clauses and risk-definition approvals. This is a negotiated contractual protection, not generic business insurance.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Contractors performing qualifying R&D work
Direct implementation · Current clauses documented
New section 3864 defines a narrow protection for classified fixed-price product contracts. A published implementing clause, delegation or demonstrated transaction was not found.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Contractors with qualifying post-enactment classified fixed-price product contracts
Unverified · Enacted; implementation not verified
BOOST is enacted and assigned to DIU, but a published BOOST-specific operating guide, intake and executed project were not located. DIU Bridge listings do not establish BOOST implementation.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Portfolio acquisition executives, program managers and product support managers requesting help integrating commercial technology
Unverified · Enacted; implementation not verified
DPAS is a working rating/assistance system with BIS-999, an identified DoD Title I office and a recent § 4511 mineral determination.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Defense-order suppliers, program offices and other eligible national-defense users.
Direct implementation · Implemented program
Industrial-resource owners/users affected by implementing measures, not loan applicants.
Documented use · Determination issued
A closed 2026 mineral call contemplated DPA guarantees. Separately, EO 14241 delegates mineral-specific DPA powers to DFC; an operating guarantee intake or completed guarantee under that delegation was not verified.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Related process · Closed — historical process
Domestic mineral-production projects within the order’s scope; this is not an application invitation.
Related process · Delegation documented; current intake not verified
A $410 million Resilience loan executed in 2023 documents historical DPA lending. Its pandemic sourcing closure does not negate the separate 2025 DFC mineral delegation; the latter’s current intake was not verified.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Historical domestic biomanufacturing recipient; not a current applicant class.
Documented use · Executed historical pandemic loan; that sourcing role ended
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Related process · Closed — historical process
Domestic mineral-production projects within the order’s scope; this is not an application invitation.
Related process · Delegation documented; current intake not verified
Public sources provide two concrete DPA execution processes and expressly identify purchase commitments, but the general FOA is suspended/expired and the 2026 mineral call is closed.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Domestic-source industrial-capacity projects.
Related process · White papers suspended; listed closing date passed
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Direct implementation · Closed — historical process
Equipment and facility expansion are concretely within a recent DPA/IBAS mineral process. No source read establishes that this call used the distinct government-owned equipment or plant powers in § 4533(e)–(g).
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Related process · Closed — historical process
VISA supplies an implemented § 4558 example, application form, continuing enrollment and a 2029 agreement endpoint. The generic Title III executor is a routing error.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualifying U.S.-flag commercial vessel operators.
Direct implementation · Program extended; enrollment published
BIS implements compulsory industrial-base surveys through SIES, with confidentiality, exemption, extension and enforcement rules. The API example was announced in 2024; no general funding intake is created.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Entities selected to receive a specific industrial-base survey.
Direct implementation · Published survey process; API launch is historical
Two distinct OSC direct-loan routes are documented: closed initial equipment intake and published NSFF fund-manager intake. SBICCT is a separate SBA-supported private-fund route.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible operating companies/project sponsors seeking equipment financing; not a general startup grant.
Direct implementation · Initial Part 1 intake closed
Professional debt-fund managers, not operating-company applicants.
Direct implementation · Published submission window
Fund managers apply for SBIC licensure; eligible small businesses approach participating private funds.
Related process · Licensing process documented; verify fund appetite
Guarantee authority and enacted credit funding are established; the researched public OSC offerings are direct loans, not a verified guarantee application program.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Potential eligible credit recipients/lenders; current guarantee-specific applicant class and intake not verified.
Unverified · Guarantee implementation not verified
Credit diligence and support, and a live provider-side counsel call, are documented. Law-firm selection is separate from company financing and statutory technical assistance.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Applicants invited into transaction diligence and existing recipients; not a standalone technical-assistance grant.
Unverified · Transaction process documented
Qualified law firms with complex equipment, corporate or project-finance experience; provider-side opportunity.
Related process · Published provider submission window
The Forum has statutory duties and a corroborated vice-chair role, but the public participation and transaction-review process remains unverified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government and vetted private/partner-nation capital participants; no public application process verified.
Unverified · Organizational role corroborated; public process not verified
IBAS has named government execution offices and published consortium processes, including a current DIBC unsolicited-concept route. The 2025 expanded activities still require their separate fund-vintage and eligibility checks.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
DIBC members in good standing with a signed consortium agreement.
Related process · Published unsolicited intake
Traditional/nontraditional firms, small businesses, academia and other eligible consortium participants.
Related process · Membership/process published; live call not certified
A real industrial consortium accepts private-equity participants, but that is not evidence that the new third-party investment power has a selected intermediary, fund, or operating intake.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Traditional/nontraditional firms, small businesses, academia and other eligible consortium participants.
Related process · Membership/process published; live call not certified
A real price-protection transaction provides useful context, but predates the new IBF market-manipulation/subsidy authority. No matching implemented IBF subsidy was located.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Named counterparty only; no general application route.
Context only · Historical agreement disclosed
A recent closed WIRE mineral call demonstrates that offtake structures are contemplated, but its explicit purchase-commitment citation is DPA § 4533, not proof of an executed IBF § 4817(i) transaction.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Related process · Closed — historical process
A documented WIRE/IBAS mineral process covers capital infrastructure and environmental review. Exact exercise of the newly enacted IBF construction authority is not established by the call alone.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Related process · Closed — historical process
The related WIRE qualification process is documented, while the new substitute/reserve/stockpile-transfer mechanism still needs a specific legal and transactional link.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Consortium applicants for listed mineral capabilities; not reserve-transfer requesters.
Related process · Historical closed call
The pilot’s legal design and near-term termination are confirmed. Related IBAS/Cornerstone activity is real, but no public evidence tied a current credit or third-party equity product to this particular pilot.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Traditional/nontraditional firms, small businesses, academia and other eligible consortium participants.
Related process · Pilot authority time-limited; specific implementation unverified
The statutory conditions are clear, but no pilot-specific launch or intake was verified. Relevant PCF policy resources do not establish a loan program or show that borrowing costs are now allowable.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Prime/subcontractors with covered production/sustainment inventory or capacity-expansion activities; independent financing entities.
Unverified · Enacted discretionary authority; implementation not verified
OEC’s adversarial-capital assessment duty is enacted, but an official operating procedure, contact or public program for this duty was not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Internal government coordination function; no verified external application program.
Unverified · Statutory duty; implementation not verified
OEC’s critical-technology capital prioritization duty is enacted, but an official operating procedure, contact or public program for this duty was not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Internal government coordination function; no verified external application program.
Unverified · Statutory duty; implementation not verified
The statute expressly includes funding investments. A standalone public OEC investment product, funding allocation and applicant process were not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Entities/technologies relevant to the statutory mission; operational applicant eligibility not verified.
Unverified · Implementation not verified
OEC’s technology-scouting/acquisition coordination duty is enacted, but an official operating procedure, contact or public program for this duty was not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Internal government coordination function; no verified external application program.
Unverified · Statutory duty; implementation not verified
OEC’s vital-asset acceleration duty is enacted, but an official operating procedure, contact or public program for this duty was not verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Internal government coordination function; no verified external application program.
Unverified · Statutory duty; implementation not verified
The statute directs OEC to help DoD provide loans, guarantees or technical assistance, including to foreign entities. It does not identify a standalone open OEC loan program.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Entities/technologies relevant to the statutory mission; operational applicant eligibility not verified.
Unverified · Implementation not verified
DLA has a working stockpile buying/selling process, annual-plan controls and historical acquisition/sales results that distinguish contracts from obligations.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualified material sellers/buyers; government stockpile managers.
Direct implementation · Operating acquisition/sales activity documented
The research route is explicitly linked to section 98g, and official DLA reports document actual material recovery and qualification activity.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Research suppliers and qualifying recovery/processing contractors; federal surplus custodians for recovery transfers.
Direct implementation · Documented research/recovery activity
Agency history confirms awareness and statutory origin of the material-loan power; no executed loan or current barter award was verified.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government material borrowers and authorized stockpile-transaction counterparties, not private cash borrowers.
Context only · Authority recognized; executed loan unverified
There is a detailed DLA research supplier process and a separate recent WIRE call that expressly covered bankable studies. Neither proves an open DLA § 98h-6 co-funding intake.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Research/qualification suppliers aligned with National Defense Stockpile needs.
Related process · Related process published; exact intake unverified
DIBC members with domestic critical-mineral projects; this call covered indium, magnesium, manganese and titanium.
Related process · Closed — historical process
DLA publishes a complete commodity-supplier workflow and reports real stockpile contract activity. Exact statutory multiyear/advance-procurement use remains to be linked to a specific notice or award.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Strategic/critical-material suppliers able to meet solicitation-specific source, quality and delivery requirements.
Related process · Operating procurement process; specific multiyear opportunity unverified
Working-capital funds are customer-funded government production accounts, not private-capital awards; CCAD documents current use of the Army model.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government customers and statutorily authorized reimbursable customers
Direct implementation · Operating model documented
Depot public-private partnerships are operating arrangements, with exact § 2474 use publicly documented at Corpus Christi Army Depot.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Private industry seeking qualifying work-sharing or use of CITE capability
Documented use · Operating partnerships reported
Published depot guidance distinguishes direct-sales authorities; a commercial customer must satisfy the particular statutory route, not simply be interested in spare capacity.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible outside purchasers, including qualifying DoD prime contractors
Direct implementation · Procedure documented
ARMS remains a documented Army facility-reuse program; the FY 2026 budget request supports commercialization of idle GOCO capacity, not a general business subsidy.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Commercial tenants suited to participating ammunition-plant or Hawthorne facilities
Direct implementation · Program budget documented
The § 7555 guarantee remains in the legal record, but JMC’s public ARMS annotation says this component is no longer used.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Potential eligible ARMS borrowers, only if a funded operating program is established
Unverified · Agency says component no longer used
Military real-property acquisition has published government real-estate channels; landowners are counterparties to a mission-driven acquisition, not applicants for general capital.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government project sponsors and owners of property sought for an authorized requirement
Related process · Office process documented
Air Force enhanced-use leasing has a concrete 2026 § 2667 solicitation example, but its August deadline has passed.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualified private or public developers responding to the particular lease competition
Documented use · Announced deadline passed
Easements have a real-estate approval track separate from environmental or waterway permits; USACE guidance explicitly invokes § 2668 for power/communications crossings.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Utilities or other parties needing a defined right across federal land
Direct implementation · Published easement process
USACE publishes an overseas lease template and a 2026 real-estate service description explicitly tied to § 2675.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government customers and eligible foreign property lessors
Direct implementation · Published government service
MILCON is a government authorization, budgeting and construction-agent process; public project delivery does not create an external capital application.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Installation project sponsors and contractors competing for subsequently solicited work
Direct implementation · Process and completed project documented
A FY 2026 Defense-Wide budget exhibit explicitly implements unspecified minor construction under § 2805, while its requested dollars are not current availability.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government facilities sponsors; contractors only through a subsequent procurement
Direct implementation · Budget process documented
USACE publicly attributes BMGR-1 barrier construction to § 2803; this documents use, not a blanket finding that every emergency-construction prerequisite is satisfied.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government urgent-construction sponsors and their competitively/otherwise lawfully selected contractors
Documented use · Construction publicly documented
New construction OT authority has concrete 2026 operating frameworks and solicitations; a master CSO is not itself an invitation for unsolicited projects.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Commercial construction performers responding to a published project AOI
Direct implementation · Framework active; project-specific intake required
Long-term facility-service contracts have a distinct budget-justification route; no recent transaction was verified as actually using § 2809.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government sponsors of enumerated facility-services projects
Direct implementation · Authority-specific process documented
Army Reserve publishes a real § 2811 delegation for O&M-funded repairs, including named command-level approval responsibilities.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Army Reserve government facilities sponsors
Direct implementation · Delegation published
Military-housing privatization is an implemented sector-specific program, with historical guarantee evidence and service execution routes. A current open developer credit application was not verified.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible developers/entities on military family or unaccompanied-housing projects; not ordinary businesses seeking general capital.
Related process · Housing program documented; project intake not verified
Express equity and debt authority exists within military-housing privatization, with documented service partnership processes. It is housing-specific, not general-purpose investment capital.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible developers/entities on military family or unaccompanied-housing projects; not ordinary businesses seeking general capital.
Related process · Housing program documented; project intake not verified
Differential lease payments have documented historical use; rental and occupancy guarantees were explicitly reported unused in FY 2024. Use of the first mechanism does not establish use of the second.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible MHPI projects where additional lease support is approved
Documented use · Historical commitments verified
Statutorily eligible MHPI entities only if the government elects to use the mechanism
Unverified · Reported unused in FY 2024
Housing property conveyance and ground leasing are documented MHPI operating tools, with 2025 guidance preserving eligibility, consideration and military rental preference.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Selected housing project entities, not arbitrary land bidders
Direct implementation · Operating structure documented
A published Utah Data Center exchange proposal expressly invoked § 2869 and documents the appraisal/environmental-review pathway, but no completed deed was verified.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government project sponsors and eligible exchange counterparties
Direct implementation · Proposal documented; completion not verified
GSA publishes real-property disposal routes with actual completed transactions; excess property is screened before surplus sales, and public-benefit eligibility is not universal.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Other federal agencies, eligible public/nonprofit entities, or public bidders depending on disposition stage
Direct implementation · Completed transaction example
Recent Army examples show IGSA use for installation operations and analytic support, with the government partner’s legal status and actual services controlling eligibility.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualifying state/local/tribal government partners and their permitted supporting contractors
Documented use · 2026 agreements documented
REPI offers an authority-specific, installation-coordinated cost-sharing route; the 2027 Challenge preproposal deadline has already passed.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible government, conservation and other partners under the chosen statutory authority
Direct implementation · Published preproposal deadline passed
DLA Energy has a dedicated utilities-privatization contracting function; the Service remains responsible for its program and project decisions.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualified utility-system owners/operators competing for installation-specific work
Direct implementation · Program documented; forecast is nonbinding
DoD long-term power purchases have a published § 2922a solicitation model; they buy energy from a project and are not federal credit assistance.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Energy developers competing to serve an identified government power requirement
Direct implementation · Authority-specific model documented
ESPC has a defined process from audit through performance and an actual 2025 Huntsville MATOC award. The $3 billion figure is contract capacity, not cash granted to 18 firms.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Qualified ESCOs and federal facility customers
Direct implementation · Contract vehicle awarded
UESCs use the installation’s eligible serving utility and a limited-source acquisition process; they differ from the ESCO savings-guarantee model.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Federal facilities and their qualifying franchised gas/water/electric utility providers
Direct implementation · Published process and 2025 assurance guide
The Navy’s own energy strategy links China Lake’s contractor-run geothermal electricity sales to § 2916; the evidence is historical, not a current electricity-sale offer.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Authorized operators and purchasing public/private utilities
Documented use · Historical example documented
USACE publishes FUDS eligibility and cleanup procedures, with 2026 response actions and continuing review examples; cleanup completion cannot be inferred from one excavation phase.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible former defense properties and affected stakeholders; cleanup contractors through procurement
Direct implementation · 2026 actions documented
OLDCC has concrete nomination and mission-adjustment processes, historical awards and a current unmanned-systems pause; it is not interchangeable with DCIP.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
States, local governmental entities and tribes meeting mission-threat criteria
Direct implementation · Rolling nomination route; unmanned-systems support paused
Communities facing qualifying closures, realignments or significant force reductions
Related process · Historical grant and ongoing assistance documented
FY 2026 DCIP has completed its reported award round: 26 grants totaling about $230 million. Eligibility, ownership and commander-support requirements are concrete and program-specific.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
State/local governments and not-for-profit member-owned utilities; ineligible partners only through compliant arrangements
Direct implementation · FY 2026 awards reported
Two mechanisms are implemented: sponsor-led FCT discovery and testing, and negotiated multinational R&D agreements. They have different intake and award processes.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Developers of mature allied/friendly foreign technology; a government sponsor develops the funded project
Direct implementation · Product discovery intake published
Eligible partner governments and their approved project participants
Direct implementation · Implemented agreement-based program
An established test-agreement program provides reciprocal facility access with cost controls and later public examples.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Partner governments and approved U.S./foreign test organizations
Direct implementation · Current annual-report use documented
Direct cooperative-contract rules and a separate NSPA vendor pathway are codified without treating NATO procurement as automatic U.S. authority use.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Participants in an approved government cooperative project and suppliers competed/designated under its lawful terms
Direct implementation · Current implementing regulation
Companies meeting NSPA and particular procurement eligibility
Related process · Actual supplier process published
An operational logistics exchange system with an actual order form, government tracking and settlement controls—not a substitute for procurement or foreign assistance authority.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Authorized foreign governments/organizations and U.S. military units exchanging eligible logistics support
Direct implementation · Current order-control process
The practical route is a documented international-project fiscal memorandum with earmarked partner receipts and account controls.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Foreign government or NATO cost-sharing participants, not private capital applicants
Direct implementation · Financial execution procedure documented
Public government guidance explains reciprocal-courtesy practice, but an individual in-kind support agreement and current signatory remain case-specific.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Foreign government counterparts under mutual-defense/occupation arrangements or customary reciprocal services
Related process · Implementing practice and fee control documented
There is a real contribution-account workflow and an explicitly attributed USACE project; neither is an open foreign-investment fund.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Designated foreign governments/regional organizations financing authorized DoD costs
Direct implementation · Fiscal process and historical project use documented
Purpose-limited host-nation relocation funding has identifiable trust accounts and approval controls. It is distinct from general burdensharing.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Host governments funding relocation of U.S. forces within their country
Direct implementation · Standing accounting implementation documented
NSIP project execution and U.S. supplier certification are different paths; both now have concrete public procedures.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Approved NATO common-funded capability projects and government implementing hosts
Direct implementation · Current governance directive documented
U.S. firms pursuing applicable NATO tenders
Related process · Application process published
An actual venture fund exists, but current fund disclosures do not establish a U.S. contribution or eligibility for U.S.-headquartered startups.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Deep-tech startups headquartered in a participating LP country and aligned venture funds
Related process · Independent fund documented; U.S. contribution not verified
MCCE exchange forms and settlement units provide concrete process evidence. Airlift, patient-movement and communications exchanges are not governed by one interchangeable agreement.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Participating government movement authorities under their applicable technical arrangements
Documented use · Operational framework documented
A recent primary-source Five Eyes medical agreement is linked without inventing a tie to section 2350t.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Military medical professionals participating through the sponsoring institutions
Related process · 2026 agreement announced; new statutory tie unverified
Regional co-sustainment has an implementing structure and overseas repair has a service planning process; each project still requires its own contract and authority.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government platform and product-support sponsors; allied MRO industry through actual contracts and partnerships
Related process · Implementation framework documented
Eligible NATO/MNNA firms bidding applicable overseas DoD equipment-maintenance contracts
Direct implementation · Internal planning process documented
The new authority has precise preconditions; neither an older IWTSD project nor the current SSO transition establishes those conditions were met.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Only covered partner governments meeting the pre-June 2025 IWTSD-agreement criterion
Unverified · Authority enacted; public implementation not verified
This is an implemented train-and-equip program with a defined government planning, vetting, notification and BPC execution process, not unrestricted partner budget support.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible foreign security forces and U.S. government program sponsors; vendors participate only through resulting acquisitions.
Direct implementation · Current implementation manual
Historical direct section 331 execution is documented; current CRSP is carefully separated because its present manual cites a different authority.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Coalition forces supporting designated operations; government planners
Documented use · Historical execution evidence
Eligible coalition forces supporting U.S. named operations
Related process · Current guidance, separate legal basis
Concrete MoDA, ISG and DIILS advising processes support defense institutional management, with separate resident and nonresident delivery.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Foreign defense/security oversight ministries and eligible regional organizations; trained U.S. government advisors.
Direct implementation · Resident and nonresident programs documented
General-force exchanges and SOF JCET have distinct purposes for training U.S. forces, approval requirements and funding channels.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
U.S. forces training with eligible foreign counterparts; not partner-led capacity grants.
Direct implementation · Published training process
U.S. SOF and approved foreign training counterparts
Direct implementation · JCET process documented
Personnel exchanges and Colombia-led training expenses have documented service/program processes; they are not interchangeable foreign travel funds.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Government military/civilian engineers, scientists and military exchange candidates; not private employment placements.
Direct implementation · Exchange procedure documented
Eligible foreign personnel participating in Colombia-led approved training
Direct implementation · Specific expense program documented
A functioning state/foreign-government partnership network has a specific nomination and oversight process, with actual documented use.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Foreign governmental military/security/disaster counterparts; U.S. state/territorial National Guards.
Direct implementation · Active partnership network
The FMS route has documented LOR, LOA, payment and implementation stages. Sales, financing and private export licensing stay distinct.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible foreign governments/international organizations; suppliers contract with the U.S. implementing agency.
Direct implementation · Established FMS process
FMF financing has actual agreements, accounting and contemporary transaction evidence, distinct from FMS sales and commercial-company lending.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible foreign governmental/international-organization defense purchasers; qualifying lenders for guarantees, not general foreign businesses.
Direct implementation · Financing program and recent use documented
An established DSCA bilateral leasing workflow includes standard formats, an associated support case and cost/return controls.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible foreign government/international organization needing temporary access to eligible DoD articles.
Direct implementation · Lease process documented
EDA surplus transfers and Presidential drawdowns are both documented, but differ in triggers, valuation, approvals and funding consequences.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible foreign governmental purchasers/recipients of declared excess equipment.
Direct implementation · EDA transfer process documented
Foreign recipients covered by the specific Presidential Determination
Direct implementation · Drawdown process documented
Two distinct routes are implemented: readiness-linked HCA under section 401 and OHDACA civilian humanitarian assistance under section 2561.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Military units conducting authorized overseas operations/exercises and civilian host communities
Direct implementation · Published project process
Civilian partner populations; U.S. government project sponsors
Direct implementation · Program documented
Denton donor-cargo transport is distinct from government-directed emergency disaster relief and from funded commercial humanitarian transportation.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
U.S.-based nongovernmental donors shipping usable humanitarian goods to developing nations
Direct implementation · Published donor route; portal access unverified
Government-requested emergency relief; affected civilian populations
Direct implementation · Standing response guidance
This is an established mine-action training and capacity program, with explicit restrictions on physical clearance work by U.S. personnel.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible partner demining/EOD and stockpile-management organizations; trained U.S. military instructors
Direct implementation · Active program documentation
CTR has identifiable implementing programs and a current budget, but partner assistance and contractor procurement are different relationships.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Civilian and military partner institutions addressing WMD-related threats; contractors only through separately competed acquisitions
Direct implementation · Implemented program and budget line
An interagency backstop with documented evaluation controls; a current publicly attributable transfer was not found.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Federal agencies implementing necessary Chapter 16-supporting assistance
Related process · Oversight process documented; current transfer not verified
Public evidence supports the distinct oversight and human-rights framework, not a business opportunity or generally available partner-assistance program.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Approved foreign forces/groups/individuals supporting authorized ongoing U.S. SOF counterterrorism operations
Context only · Public governance evidence; individual implementation not verified
Actual education programs, disaggregated fiscal lines and an IWC support form are documented; university partnership authority is not presented as an open grant.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Senior foreign government/security officials; RDFP-approved military and security-ministry participants
Direct implementation · Programs and fiscal lines documented
Individuals and organizations requesting mission-aligned speakers, courses or research support
Direct implementation · Public request form documented
Real institutional processes exist, but NATO accreditation, U.S. cost-share authority and individual college admissions remain separate approvals.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible U.S. military/civilian participants and statutorily covered multinational centers
Related process · International establishment process documented
Nominated military, police, diplomatic and government professionals
Related process · Admissions process published; cycle must be confirmed
A concrete program code, student tracking and vetting workflow are documented; full delivery intake is still a bounded public-evidence gap.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible foreign military/civilian personnel receiving interoperability-focused materials and necessary IT
Direct implementation · Reporting process implemented; delivery instructions partial
Public records establish historical cryptologic cooperation, but they do not disclose current § 421 payment arrangements or connect a named modern partnership to a particular funding branch.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government cryptologic partners and authorized resource officials
Unverified · Current payment implementation unverified
Researchers of international cryptologic cooperation
Context only · Historical cooperation evidence
The statute contains a narrow proceeds exception. Public legal commentary argues for additional legislation in adjacent cyber contexts, reinforcing that this exception is not a general commercial-revenue power.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Authorized government counterintelligence and fiscal officials
Unverified · Specific execution unverified
This is a constrained government security mechanism for otherwise-authorized foreign intelligence collection. The FY 2026 addition creates a vendor-risk/deconfliction governance duty, not a publicly documented business opportunity.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Authorized government officials; not a general company formation or investment route
Unverified · Operational implementation not publicly verified
The public fiscal framework distinguishes MIP § 429a from DIA’s NIP authority. A 2026 lapse memorandum references § 429a, but no specific certified expense or available account is disclosed.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Authorized government intelligence finance officials
Unverified · Expense-level implementation unverified
Government continuity planners
Related process · Dated policy reference
Intelligence transfer accounts are a legal accounting mechanism, not new budget authority. Public budget analysis explains the framework without disclosing a current § 429 ledger.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government budget and accounting officials
Unverified · Specific accounts and balances unverified
Congress authorized a bounded DIA foreign-contribution mechanism with a December 31, 2028 sunset. Public mission descriptions do not establish that a particular partner has contributed under it.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible government partners in joint or combined military intelligence activity
Unverified · Implementation agreement not located
The classified facility-clearance process is established. A May 2026 proposed rule would implement expanded Section847 ownership-risk reviews for covered contracts; no final-rule effective date was verified.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Entities needing classified access for a legitimate government requirement
Related process · Published sponsorship process
Contractors potentially covered by the expanded statutory regime
Related process · Proposed rule published; final rule not verified
A released NCIS letter documents historical use of the financial-record framework. It is not a current template, and the FBI-specific compulsory power must not be attributed to DoD.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government legal/compliance officials and recipient financial institutions
Documented use · Historical example only
NSA’s live page links a FY 2027 mathematics solicitation due October 15, 2026. The call is current. Funding is contingent, and the document contains conflicting duration statements.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
U.S. nonprofit institutions applying on behalf of eligible principal investigators
Related process · Deadline published; funds contingent
NGA publicly describes international co-production and data exchange. Those activities are documented, but the publication does not establish which agreement uses §§ 453–455 or disclose map-sale receipts.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible government and other authorized geospatial partners
Related process · Published partnership activity
Law-enforcement support uses a government request-and-approval process, not an unrestricted police or private procurement power.
process documented · checked 2026-10-04
Civilian law-enforcement agencies with a lawful support requirement
Direct implementation · Published government request framework
Counterdrug/transnational-crime support has a defined legal menu, but current border operations involve multiple authorities. The 2026 task-force announcement does not establish § 284 for every activity.
implementation not verified · checked 2026-10-04
Government requesters, not companies applying for a grant
Unverified · Statutory request process
Government interagency partners
Context only · Organization announced
The 1122 program is a purchase channel for eligible state/local governments. It is not a grant, and it is distinct from 1033 excess-property transfers.
program documented · checked 2026-10-04
Eligible state and local government agencies
Direct implementation · Published purchasing route