At a glance
Possible toolINT-17 · Other statutory tools
Authority holder: Military Department Secretary or combatant commander for §321 payments; designated combatant commanders for §322, within SecDef-approved procedures.
Other statutory tools
Mechanism tags describe the source text; they do not expand the authority.
Availability and verificationExisting statutory pathway; conditional on the listed findings, approvals, eligible purpose and actual available funds. Not an obligation-ready certification.
Funding conditions
- §321 allows covered activities spanning into next fiscal year; check actual funds.
- Partner incremental expenses do not become general salary/budget support.
Read the funding and execution guide
Who contributes what
Need & planning
- Geographic or functional CCMD security-cooperation planners
Office profile - Embassy SCO and Chief of Mission country team
Approval
- Secretary of Defense prior approval under prescribed regulations
Office profile - Service Secretary or combatant commander statutory payment authority
Execution
- Service units and exercise contracting/support offices
- USSOCOM/theater special operations commands for §322
Office profile
Partners & review
- Foreign partner government
- Department of State
- Export-control/foreign-disclosure officials
Office links are editorial matches to the original role text, not verified delegations. Composite labels and unmatched actors are preserved.
Coordination pathwayExercise sponsor → CCMD/Service counsel and comptroller → identify §321 vs322 purpose/recipient → SecDef approval → authorized payments and reporting.
Actor and execution-role sources
What this research establishes
Legal basisSources linkedLegal sources and instrument limits are recorded.
RequirementsGates recordedRead the requirements for this instrument; applicability depends on the proposed action.
Public fundingScale documentedFY2027 O&M request: $10.891 billion, plus separately budgeted acquisition accounts. Institutional/program context, not a funding allocation to this specific action. Assigned rolesRemit sourcedPublic sources describe institutional authority. The instrument identifies approval and execution roles; a specific signature remains transaction-dependent. EngagementRoutes publishedThe office profile lists public routes and their scope. Not every route accepts applications for this instrument. Confidence: High on express statutory capability; execution/delegation and currently available resources require program-specific confirmation.
Currentness: GovInfo2024 §§321-322 read; Pub. L.119-60 §1201 directly applied: revised eligible forces and payment categories; quarterly retrospective report replaces prospective schedule.
Review scope: Original research target October 2, 2026; no record-specific last-review date supplied. Publication is not legal-currentness certification.